Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search |
|
| |
| Questions, Answers, Information and Comments | |
Topic: BEST JACKPOT LOTTO GAME IN THE WORLD |
|
| Author | Message |
|
Colin F
Lotto Systems Tester Creator & Analyst
To dream the impossible dream ... Joined: September 30 2004 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 642 |
![]() Topic: BEST JACKPOT LOTTO GAME IN THE WORLDPosted: August 06 2010 at 9:33pm |
|
BEST JACKPOT LOTTO GAME IN THE WORLD
by Colin Fairbrother
Lottery operators currently work on the basis of very big Jackpots to draw interest and increase ticket sales. For regular players who accept that in all probability they will never win a Lotto jackpot in their lifetime but still play, of more interest is how often they get a win and the percentage return.
Recently 12th May 2010 the parameters for the UK Thunderball Jackpot game were changed from a Pool of 34 to 39 for the main numbers but still 1 from 14 for the Power or Thunderball and a £3 prize if you got the Thunderball alone. The operators state they return 52.882% of sales in prizes. First prize is a not insignificant £500,000.00. Prize and Odds breakdown are as follows: -
Prize Win £ Odds 1 in
5 Main + Thunderball 500,000 8,060,598
5 Main 5,000 620,046
4 Main + Thunderball 250 47,415
4 Main 100 3,647
3 Main + Thunderball 20 1,437
2 Main + Thunderball 10 135
3 Main 10 111
1 Main + Thunderball 5 35
0 Main + Thunderball 3 29
On a Usenet group I posted a set of 14 numbers produced by LottoToWin. The group over the years since 1995 has had contributions from those capable of thinking in this area of interest but now has been taken over by a dozen or so predictionists, loonies and UseNet thugs with very foul mouths. Having made the group unbearable to any one with any self respect they now indulge in trivial abusive banter between themselves somehow thinking the traffic to the group is reading their garbage when in fact I have discovered the overwhelming majority is going to previous articles which the likes of Google have included in their links.
As each of the ThunderBalls were in my set at least a £3 prize would be won for each draw over the 20 week trial. See Numbers Posted or: -
01 04 12 25 35 PB 11
11 16 18 29 34 PB 10 08 24 26 32 33 PB 09 10 17 22 36 37 PB 01 07 13 19 30 38 PB 04 05 06 09 14 27 PB 07 03 15 20 28 31 PB 06 02 21 23 35 39 PB 12 01 02 08 16 36 PB 03 04 17 29 32 39 PB 05 10 11 12 21 33 PB 13 22 23 25 26 34 PB 14 05 18 24 30 37 PB 08 13 14 16 24 31 PB 02 My return percentage of 60% for a LottoToWin set was better than the odds for the five lowest prize levels which indicate a return of 43% is in order.
Draw Date £ Cost 3+TB 3 2+TB 1+TB 0+TB £ Prizes £ Cum
June 23, 2010 14 - - - 1 - 5 5
June 25, 2010 14 - - - - 1 3 8
June 26, 2010 14 - - - 1 - 5 13
June 30, 2010 14 - - - - 1 3 16
July 2, 2010 14 - - - 1 - 5 21
July 3, 2010 14 - 1 - - 1 13 34
July 7, 2010 14 - - - 1 - 5 39
July 9, 2010 14 - 1 - - 1 13 52
July 10, 2010 14 - - - - 1 3 55
July 14, 2010 14 1 - - - - 20 75
July 16, 2010 14 - - - 1 - 5 80
July 17, 2010 14 - 1 - 1 - 15 95
July 21, 2010 14 - - - - 1 3 98
July 23, 2010 14 - 1 - - 1 13 111
July 24, 2010 14 1 - - - - 20 131
July 28, 2010 14 1 - - - - 20 151
July 30, 2010 14 - - - 1 - 5 156
July 31, 2010 14 - - - - 1 3 159
Aug 4, 2010 14 - - - 1 - 5 164
Aug 6, 2010 14 - - - - 1 3 167
280
Percentage Return 167/280 * 100 = 59.64%
By comparison the resident chief predictionist and village idiot in that usenet group Robert Perkis (or Bob P) who deludes himself into thinking he knows something other than nonsense in this field of interest, achieved only a very weak 29% return. Another idiot that goes under the pseudonym Nick UK posted only one set of numbers on June 22, 2010 and got below the expected 43% with only 34%. This mortified him so much that he subsequently published a fictitious set of results outside the predetermined dates and after the draws (a common ruse by Lotto charlatans using tickets purchased by others), which included two £100 wins.
An interesting point is that the UK Thunderball game gives the best guaranteed return I know of in a Jackpot Lotto game. For an outlay of £14 for 14 lines if you play all 14 Thunderballs you are guaranteed a £3 minimum return ie 21.43%.
Academics and others justified playing high cost distorted prize range Covers that guaranteed a small prize for a disproportionately high cost, purportedly because Lotto players wanted to get a prize in every draw. (Never did see any statistics to support this argument.) If you so desperately want a guaranteed prize every draw and play the 163 line cover for the 6/49 game then in the UK you get £10 for an outlay of £81.50 or 12.27%. In the USA the payouts are lower so, for example Washington pays a minimum $3 for an outlay of $81.50 or only 3.68% The UK Thunderball is unbeatable for a Jackpot Lotto game at 21.43% if playing all the Thunderballs at a cost of £14.
Personally, I think most Lotto players would like to get a prize regularly and in proportion to what they spend with the objective of having a chance, albeit extremely minimal, of a Jackpot win. Only a small percentage of players, like me, are interested in monitoring and maximizing their return to see how it accords with or beats the odds.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|